@Lotta: Usagi × Pompompurin Plush Bag

• Reference price: HKD 248

The first time I saw this plush bag at a Sanrio store in Beijing Hanguang Department Store, I didn’t feel a strong urge to buy it—I assumed I could easily find it online later. But when I decided I wanted one to celebrate Pompompurin’s 30th anniversary, I realized that most listings on Taobao priced in the hundreds were just AI-generated images, while those with real photos were cheap knockoffs costing only a few dozen yuan. Just as I was about to give up, a friend found this bag on the Misutabai official website in Hong Kong, which supports SF Express shipping to mainland China. There were only two or three left in stock, so I quickly placed an order while still hesitating. As a result, I received the bag on Pompompurin’s birthday.

The bag turned out to be even smaller than I expected—roughly the same size as the Chiikawa mini crossbody bags from Miniso. It can barely fit an iPhone 17 and definitely can’t fit my OPPO Find X9, but it easily holds a Chiikawa phone 🌝.

Compared to Miniso’s version, which uses a fabric strap sewn onto one side, this plush bag features a leather strap with metal lobster clasps on both ends. The zipper is also a metal yellow star, which feels much more refined than Miniso’s acrylic zipper. However, if you want to remove the strap and display it as a plush toy, you’ll need to stuff the bag to maintain a nice shape—unlike Miniso’s version, which holds its form even when empty.

If you want to identify an authentic version, you can look at other details. For example, the “Chiikawa × Sanrio Characters” logo on the back is made of leather, and the product tag is square-shaped, not round like many listings on Taobao.

This series also includes other combinations like Hachi × Cinnamoroll, Chiikawa × Hello Kitty, and Flying Squirrel × Kuromi. If you’re interested, it’s worth looking into. Finally, congratulations to Pompompurin for currently ranking No.1 in mainland China in the 2026 Sanrio Character Popularity Contest!

@路中南: Petlibro Gravity Dump Water Fountain 2S

• Reference price: ¥200

I replaced the old Petkit water fountain at home for three main reasons:

• There are two cats at home. The younger one loves to “wash its paws” in the fountain, which means the older one ends up drinking dirty water—leading to occasional stomach issues;
• The Petkit fountain is too subtle—its indicator light isn’t very noticeable, and when things get busy, I often only realize it’s empty when the cats start searching for water;
• Last year, I even cleaned out quite a bit of grime from the pump; and the replacement filters have become too expensive.

This Petlibro fountain works on a completely different principle compared to Petkit’s “filter the same tank of water repeatedly.” Instead, it divides water into portions and replaces “old water” in batches. Each cycle discards the previous water and dispenses fresh water, which is why it’s called a “dump-style” fountain.

That’s essentially its core function. The clean water tank holds about 3L, and since I have a direct drinking water purifier at home, refilling it is convenient. The wastewater tank at the bottom is basically ready-made “used water,” which I can pour straight into the fish tank—so nothing goes to waste, similar to how I reuse water from my robot vacuum. After running this fountain continuously for over three weeks, I’m overall quite satisfied:

1. It actually has a heating function. In the cold winters of Jiangsu and Zhejiang, my Guangdong-born cats aren’t very tolerant of low temperatures. The old Petkit fountain didn’t have heating, and drinking cold water could sometimes cause stomach discomfort or even vomiting. I haven’t been able to test this feature yet due to the current season, but its 8.5W heating power should be sufficient for a device of this size.
2. There are multiple ways to trigger water dispensing, and the output volume can be customized. If you like tinkering, you can create a highly customized “water schedule,” though I ultimately chose the simplest “interval dispensing” mode, along with a fallback low-water auto refill. The “motion-triggered dispensing” depends heavily on placement—its sensing range is so wide that sometimes it activates just because a cat or person walks by at a distance, making it overly sensitive.
3. The companion app looks clean and provides data on water output and pet drinking volume—something the old Petkit fountain didn’t offer.
4. Surprisingly, it includes a 4000mAh battery, which allows it to keep running for quite a while during power outages, and even makes it portable (USB-C charging).

Overall, getting a pet water fountain like this for around ¥200 is already quite impressive, though it’s not perfect. First, its smart home connectivity isn’t built into the device itself (likely for battery and power considerations). Instead, it comes with a USB-like gateway that needs to be paired separately and plugged into a power source before remote control via the app is possible. Second, the beeping sounds and the noise from the dumping mechanism can be quite noticeable at night. If you’re sensitive to noise while sleeping, you may want to customize the dispensing schedule.

@Microhoo: DJI Pocket 4

• Reference price: ¥2999

Back when the Pocket 3 went viral, I was tempted for a while but didn’t act. The main reason was that I felt its core significance was more about finally “filling the gap” in the all-in-one gimbal camera category after a couple of iterations—it gave media professionals and vlog creators a truly usable tool. The stabilization quality from a three-axis mechanical gimbal is something no smartphone OIS+EIS combination can replicate; the physical advantages of a 1-inch sensor in low light and dynamic range, along with the added “ritual” value compared to a phone, firmly established it as a capable video tool.

But its audience has always been those with clear, specific needs—its strengths require the right scenarios to shine. Without that context, its shortcomings become obvious. Especially at the time of its popularity, smartphone imaging also saw a sudden leap forward, so for me, it wasn’t as convenient as just using a phone. Still, I was very much looking forward to the next generation, because DJI usually understands what users want. If I had to sum up the Pocket 4 in one sentence—it finally addresses most of those “almost there” shortcomings.

Pocket 4 adds two physical buttons for zoom and customizable functions, while the rest of the design and operation remain nearly identical to its predecessor. The real focus is on improvements in image quality and performance. The most noticeable change is in still photography.

To be honest, the photo function on the Pocket 3 felt more like an emergency option. While the large sensor delivered excellent detail, its 9.4MP resolution lagged behind even many mid-range smartphones, making it feel outdated. With Pocket 4 upgraded to 37MP, its overall imaging quality now rivals dedicated cameras. Combined with highly usable built-in filters, beauty effects, and Live Photo output, even users without professional intent can get better photo and video results than most smartphones in many scenarios.

This generation also introduces a feature I find particularly interesting—an expansion accessory port on the back of the gimbal, supporting both data communication and power delivery. An official external fill light is already available, and when connected through this port, its power, color temperature matching, and brightness adjustments are all controlled directly by the camera, eliminating the need for separate batteries or manual parameter tuning.

It may sound like a small detail, but in complex lighting scenarios where you need to capture usable footage quickly, the reduction in operational burden is very noticeable. More importantly, the design of this interface suggests room for future expansion—if DJI continues building out an accessory ecosystem, the Pocket 4’s use cases could expand even further.

Slow motion is another major upgrade, and arguably the most impressive performance improvement. While the Pocket 3’s 4K/120fps was already top-tier in its class, the Pocket 4 pushes this to 4K/240fps—roughly equivalent to 10× slow motion compared to standard 24fps video—entering territory previously reserved for professional cameras. After shooting a few clips, the ability to stretch fleeting moments into something cinematic feels far beyond simply “slowing things down.”

Comparing frames from 240fps video to still photos, while there is some drop in dynamic range and resolution, the results remain highly usable—it’s hard to believe such performance comes from a device this compact.

Storage and transfer are often overlooked but critical to workflow efficiency. In an era where storage is precious, the Pocket 4’s 107GB of built-in storage eliminates the need for additional memory cards for most users. Wired USB 3.1 and wireless Wi-Fi 6 also significantly reduce waiting time when transferring footage. The dynamic range has improved from 12 stops to 14 stops, color format upgraded from D-Log M to full D-Log, and audio now supports four-channel spatial recording with independent channel control in post—features that benefit more advanced creators.

Overall, with these combined improvements, I feel the Pocket 4 has evolved from a “specialized tool for a niche audience” into a device that many more people can pick up and use directly. It retains the core advantages of the Pocket 3 as an all-in-one gimbal camera, while no longer requiring users to compromise as much for its shortcomings. This year feels like a turning point for this category, with multiple brands preparing to launch competing products. While it’s hard to say whether the Pocket 4 has an absolute advantage, given DJI’s experience and track record in handheld imaging, it will likely remain the most broadly appealing option.

That said, competition and pressure are real. I see the Pocket 4 as a refinement and reflection after the success of its predecessor, while the briefly teased dual-camera version may be the more compelling answer for professional creators who loved the earlier models. I’m looking forward to it.

@Clyde: Tolek Punk Power “Famicom” Power Strip

• Reference price: ¥249

A few years ago, before everyone at the office started hitting middle age, we all somehow ended up buying those tall, boxy power strip organizers from Bull—great for hiding a bunch of plugs on the desk. They did solve the clutter problem, but after sitting there for a while, they felt like a waste of space—and more importantly, they just didn’t look good. So when someone at home needed a power strip, I generously gave mine away.

Then I bought this Tolek punk-style “Famicom” power strip.

Compared to the brick-style modular one we sell, this “Punk Power Famicom” version doesn’t have as many tricks. If you’re nostalgic, you might be drawn in by the “Famicom” design before buying—but after placing the order, it’s best to reset your expectations and just treat it as what it really is: a power strip. The device has three buttons, all centered around the front display, which looks large but actually only occupies about 40% of the width on the left side. The big red button on top turns the display on and off, while the two smaller round buttons control the display zones—left button controls the right side, and right button controls the left side. Yes, it’s counterintuitive. If anyone from Tolek is reading this, feel free to explain the logic.

The display shows some basic runtime information, including a colored bar at the top indicating current power load, and real-time current and voltage readings below. For a power strip, it’s more of a visual gimmick—you’re unlikely to rely on it for diagnosing real issues. The numbers exist more to serve “desk aesthetics” than functionality. The left side of the display is even more so—you can toggle between a smiling face, a crying face, and a looping Tetris animation. None of them are particularly sophisticated or emotionally engaging. Before buying, I even imagined it might support firmware flashing or custom display content—now I think I must’ve been drunk.

So again, keep your expectations grounded: it’s a power strip. That said, the color scheme is classic, and the design has a retro charm. Writing this reminded me of my old Keychron Q1 Pro (SSPAI limited edition) with a broken key. Putting them side by side actually looks pretty fitting:

Finally, one reason I didn’t just ask a colleague for the Pixel 65 modular power strip was that my current desktop power needs are quite high. Even though this model has four rear outlets that support both two- and three-prong plugs, in practice, four still feels limiting. The two USB-C ports and one USB-A port on the front handle high-frequency charging tasks, but that’s about all it can manage. Compared to this, the three-outlet modular version would likely be even less practical.

One last responsible reminder: this unusual design does come with balance and weight distribution issues. If you’re plugging in standard cables, it’s fine—but bulkier power adapters can cause problems. You’ll need to make sure the cables at the back don’t constantly pull it backward, or it might shift around. Honestly, it would’ve been great if they had added suction cups to the bottom.

@waychane: Aqara FP310 Presence Sensor

• Reference price: ¥249

Good-looking design and flexible installation—that’s my overall impression of Aqara’s recently released AI multi-dimensional presence sensor FP310. As part of the “infrastructure” of a smart home, I generally believe you can never have too many sensors, so I picked one up and installed it in the laundry room.

In terms of design, the FP310 combines elements of traditional motion sensors with the form factor of the earlier FP2 presence sensor. The sensing unit has a slightly cylindrical shape, with an adjustable-angle base at the bottom, and the overall size is roughly comparable to AirPods Pro.

Since it is battery-powered, the FP310 isn’t restricted by power outlet placement, making installation highly flexible. More notably, it introduces magnetic mounting for the first time—the base contains built-in magnets, allowing it to attach directly to metal surfaces. If you don’t have a suitable magnetic surface, that’s not a problem either: the FP310 comes with a magnetic plate that can be attached to a wall using adhesive, allowing you to mount the sensor onto it.

Functionally, the FP310 uses the same millimeter-wave radar detection as the FP2, making it more precise than traditional motion sensors. It can accurately detect presence even when a person is stationary. In the Aqara app, you can adjust sensitivity based on room size, set the timeout for detecting absence, and configure the radar detection range (0–6 meters). However, it does not support zone-based detection and is limited to single-area monitoring.

In addition, the FP310 integrates temperature, humidity, and ambient light sensors, enabling more advanced automation scenarios—for example, controlling air conditioning based on temperature or turning lights on/off based on brightness. The Aqara app also allows you to adjust the sampling frequency of these sensors or disable them entirely to extend battery life.

In terms of connectivity, the FP310 supports both Zigbee and Thread (Matter), with the latter expanding its compatibility across platforms. Since I only needed integration with Apple Home, I connected it via Zigbee.

As for buying advice, given that the FP310 is battery-powered and lacks zone detection, I wouldn’t recommend installing it in large spaces like living or dining rooms where people stay for extended periods. Instead, it’s better suited for smaller areas such as kitchens, bathrooms, or laundry rooms, where its multi-sensor capabilities can be effectively combined with devices like lights or bathroom heaters for automation.