Tag: MacBook Pro

  • From Retina Classics to the Future of Apple Silicon: Ten Years, Three Generations, and My MacBook Evolution

    From Retina Classics to the Future of Apple Silicon: Ten Years, Three Generations, and My MacBook Evolution

    Preface

    As someone entering middle age, I’ve already started to feel nostalgic.

    Before the iPhone, the Apple product that left the deepest impression on me was probably the MacBook. As the first computer I bought with my own money after starting work, my MacBook journey happened to span three distinct eras:

    • Astonishing & iconic: MacBook Pro with Retina (2014, 13-inch);
    • A performance beast: MacBook Pro with i7 (2019, 16-inch);
    • A chip-driven reinvention: MacBook Pro with M2 Pro (2023, 14-inch).

    Over the past decade-plus, the MacBook lineup has undergone dramatic changes. These weren’t just incremental hardware upgrades, but profound shifts in design philosophy, user experience, and ecosystem integration.

    A side-by-side look at the three MacBook Pros

    As my primary productivity tool, this piece isn’t merely a list of devices. It’s a decade of growing alongside the MacBook—a record of how I used it to move from being a reader to becoming a content creator.

    The MacBook Pro that travels with me on business trips

    Planting the Seed: MacBook Air

    Starting in 2006, Apple abandoned PowerPC and fully transitioned to Intel, ushering in a new era of collaboration between Apple and Intel.

    In 2008, Steve Jobs pulled a laptop out of a manila envelope in that now-legendary keynote moment. With its unibody aluminum design—so thin that even its thickest point was slimmer than competitors’ thinnest—it didn’t just stun the audience in the room. It also planted a seed deep in my heart.

    The Stunning Impact of Retina

    In early 2015, I bought my first Apple device: a 13-inch MacBook Pro with Retina (the base model).

    If the MacBook Air stood for thin and light, then this generation of the MacBook Pro with Retina represented balance. In terms of design, it carried on the unibody aluminum chassis, with an excellent build quality. By removing the optical drive and mechanical hard disk, Apple ensured a slimmer profile—far lighter and thinner than the laptops I used back in college. The glowing Apple logo on the lid remains a classic to this day.

    More importantly, it offered an exceptionally rich selection of ports: MagSafe magnetic charging, HDMI video output, an SD card slot, Thunderbolt 2, and two USB-A ports. It was a true “all-round productivity machine” that could handle almost any task without the need for a dongle.

    The display deserves special mention. Seeing a Retina screen for the first time was genuinely breathtaking, and even by today’s standards, it still holds up well. I remember a friend who had just bought a MacBook Air (non-Retina); after seeing my screen, they immediately regretted their purchase.

    With an Intel Core processor, a Retina display, plentiful ports, and a scissor-switch keyboard—paired with macOS’s clean interface, free from pop-ups and virus anxiety—it laid the foundation for my trust in the MacBook as a machine that is “open the lid and get to work,” stable and reliable.

    Thanks to the Thunderbolt 2 port, I also entered the era of a dual-monitor desk setup: the MacBook Pro as the main machine, connected to a Xiaomi 34-inch curved display, forming my version 1.0 desktop setup.

    My desk setup in 2019
    My desk setup in 2020

    A Small Interlude

    The Product I Most Hope to See Revived: the 12-inch MacBook

    The design of the 12-inch MacBook could be considered the pinnacle of Apple’s design at the time—and even today, it hardly feels outdated. Limited by its performance, however, it could only ever be a toy for a very small group of users. With the arrival of the M-series chips, which offer far better performance, thermals, and power efficiency, this line has become the product I most want Apple to bring back.

    A Monster and the Controversy

    A Leap in Performance and Intel’s Struggle

    As my work began to demand more performance, I upgraded to the 2019 16-inch MacBook Pro (i7 processor, 32GB RAM). There’s no denying it: at the time, this machine was a bona fide performance monster.

    From dual-core to six-core, from 13 inches to 16 inches—the performance jump was massive. Image editing times dropped dramatically, and running multiple virtual machines became effortless. This was Apple pushing the Intel-based MacBook Pro to its absolute limits.

    But constrained by thermal design, it also gave rise to the infamous “single heat pipe trying to tame an i9” moments—one of the reasons I opted for the i7 instead. Under heavy load, the chassis temperature would spike rapidly, and the fans would roar like a jet taking off, seriously affecting my focus while working.

    That said, the return of the scissor-switch keyboard, the excellent speakers, and Touch ID were all welcome highlights of this generation. On the downside, only Thunderbolt 3, USB-C, and the headphone jack remained. All other ports were cut—even staples like the SD card slot and HDMI—making external expansion a clear drawback.

    The Touch Bar was another source of controversy. Intended to replace physical function keys, it did bring novelty to certain applications, but ultimately proved to be a productivity hindrance rather than a help.

    While I fully acknowledge that the 16-inch MacBook Pro was a powerful, workstation-class machine, who could have imagined that in less than two years it would be replaced by ARM-based MacBook Pros?

    To better tame this performance beast and improve the overall experience, I chose the following accessories to build my desktop setups from version 2.0 to 3.0.

    • Thunderbolt 3 dock: a single cable to solve everything—connecting external displays while providing stable power and data transfer, greatly reducing the clutter of multiple cables on the desk.
    • Cooling: to address the high heat output of Intel chips, I initially placed the laptop on a stand. This not only raised the screen to eye level, reducing neck strain, but also helped with airflow. Still, passive cooling wasn’t enough for the i7, so I later added an active liquid-cooling solution. Even then, the results were far from ideal.
    My desk setup in 2021
    My desk setup in 2022
    My desk setup in 2023

    Reshaping and the Future

    In 2020, Apple kicked off its transition to the ARM platform.

    Fifteen years later, the Mac once again changed its chip architecture.

    For Apple, raw performance may not be the ultimate goal, but power efficiency and thermal control are areas where it refuses to compromise. During the years of collaboration with Intel, many Mac products suffered from overheating issues. With the rapid maturation of the ARM architecture, Apple could finally move it onto the Mac with confidence.

    People who are really serious about software should make their own hardware.

    Today, Mac chips are designed entirely by Apple. By integrating various functions onto a single chip, Apple not only reduces costs but also achieves tighter integration. In-house silicon enables Macs to work more seamlessly with other Apple devices, strengthening the ecosystem and breaking down barriers between products.

    The M-chip Revolution: A Cross-Generation “Dimensionality Reduction”

    Moving from Intel flagships to a MacBook Pro powered by the M2 Pro chip was nothing short of a generational leap.

    The most immediate sensation is “calmness.” Tasks that once sent fans into a frenzy can now be completed quietly and coolly by the M2 Pro. At the same time, it achieves a near-perfect balance between performance and battery life. Intel laptops used to feel like they lost their soul once unplugged; M-series Macs can deliver a full day of efficient work without ever touching a power outlet.

    In terms of design, Apple performed a kind of “course correction.” With a return to a more classic look, today’s MacBook Pro may not appear as thin and light as before—but the Pro line has always been a tool for professionals. Thinness was never the core of “Pro”; usability is. This return to practicality is the best interpretation of what “Pro” truly means.

    Compared to the Intel era, the return of MagSafe, HDMI, and the SD card slot—along with support for high-impedance headphones—signals that Apple has finally acknowledged the core, practical needs of professional users.

    The Mini-LED display delivers stunning contrast, and ProMotion’s high refresh rate turns every scroll and every viewing moment into a visual pleasure. As for the notch, that’s simply a matter of personal taste.

    After experiencing the size and weight of the 16-inch model, I decisively chose the 14-inch this time. It strikes a better balance between performance and portability—lighter than the 16-inch, yet more powerful than the 13-inch.

    As for this generation of desk setup, the guiding principle was “subtraction.” I removed all unnecessary accessories and upgraded the external display to an LG UltraFine 4K, aiming to match the color accuracy of the MacBook Pro’s built-in screen.

    My desk setup in 2024
    My desk setup in 2025

    MacBook and Apple Vision Pro

    At present, Apple’s MacBook lineup positioning is already very clear:

    • MacBook Air focuses on light productivity: 13-inch and 15-inch;
    • MacBook Pro targets professional use: 14-inch and 16-inch.

    There are rumors that in the spring of 2026 Apple will release a MacBook aimed at the education market, powered by an A-series chip and priced lower. If this model does arrive, Apple’s MacBook lineup will become even more complete and better aligned with different user needs.

    Apple Vision Pro

    With the release of Apple Vision Pro, it’s natural to ask: will it eventually replace the MacBook as the next-generation productivity tool?

    For MacBook users, Vision Pro brings qualitative improvements in several areas:

    First is the “infinite” and “mobile” nature of physical displays. Vision Pro offers the Mac Virtual Display feature, fundamentally redefining the concept of a workspace. While MacBooks are constrained by physical screen size, Vision Pro can project the Mac desktop onto a massive, adjustable virtual display—essentially letting you carry a top-tier 100-inch monitor with you at all times.

    Second is an upgrade in multitasking space. Traditional MacBook multitasking relies on Mission Control or switching between apps. In Vision Pro, the Mac desktop can exist as one window, surrounded by natively running web pages, email, or even 3D models. This hybrid layout of Mac + visionOS apps greatly enhances the intuitiveness of multitasking.

    Finally, Vision Pro naturally ushers in a shift in the “center of computation.” In the past, the MacBook was the computing core and the screen was merely for display. In the era of spatial computing, the MacBook gradually becomes a high-performance computing module without a screen. Users may no longer care about the MacBook’s display quality, brightness, or size, because the visual experience is taken over by the headset.

    Image generated by Google Gemini

    That said, the current Vision Pro experience is far from perfect: wearing comfort, the limited number of third-party visionOS apps, and the exploration of efficient input methods are all issues that still need to be addressed.

    So at this stage, the relationship between the two is more about coexistence and complementarity rather than direct replacement. The MacBook, with its powerful M-series thermal management and long battery life, is well suited for sustained, high-intensity workloads (such as code compilation or complex modeling), while Vision Pro focuses on delivering extreme visual presentation and spatial interaction.

    Epilogue

    My ten-year journey with the MacBook is also a microcosm of Apple’s shift from a hardware-spec arms race to an ecosystem built around in-house chips. We’ve lived through the golden age of the classic scissor-switch keyboard, the growing pains of the butterfly keyboard, and the struggles of Intel processors—only to finally arrive at the perfect triangle brought by Apple silicon: battery life, performance, and silence.

    For me, the core value of the MacBook has long gone beyond the simple combination of a screen and a processor. It represents a way of working that is efficient, stable, and aesthetically pleasing. That’s also why I’ve consistently held the MacBook in higher regard than the iPhone.

    Across these three pivotal evolutions over ten years, which generation of MacBook design or experience is your favorite? Feel free to share your own experiences in the comments.

  • AI Era, New Journey: A Quick Look at the M5 MacBook Pro

    AI Era, New Journey: A Quick Look at the M5 MacBook Pro

    Friends, the MacBook Pro powered by the M5 chip has finally arrived.


    Appearance & Configuration: Almost No Changes

    The M5 MacBook Pro represents a routine upgrade for the series—so routine that aside from the updated M5 chip, almost all other configurations remain unchanged. To save you reading time, I will briefly outline the similarities between the new and previous models in this section. If you’d like a more detailed understanding of the base model MacBook Pro, you can also refer to the hands-on review of the M4 MacBook Pro article.

    First, the external design is literally unchanged. Paint texture, keyboard feel, even the weight—everything is the same.

    Next, on paper, the base-tier Apple silicon specs seem unchanged as well: both M4 and M5 feature a 10-core CPU, a 10-core GPU, and a 16-core Neural Engine (NPU), with memory options up to 32GB.
    The differences do exist though: M5 brings upgraded memory bandwidth — up to 153GB/s — and offers up to 4TB of storage (vs. 2TB on M4). Most importantly, Apple significantly improved the NPU performance, which we’ll compare in detail later.

    https://www.apple.com/newsroom/images/2025/10/apple-unleashes-m5-the-next-big-leap-in-ai-performance-for-apple-silicon/article/Apple-M5-chip-251015_inline.jpg.large.jpg
    Core specifications comparison between M5 (left) and M4 chips, image captured from Apple
    https://www.trustedreviews.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/7/2025/10/apple-m5-vs-m4-pro.jpg
    The performance boost of the NPU is the standout feature of this generation of Apple silicon. Image captured from Apple.

    Secondly, there is no difference in battery life between the new and old generations, both offering a typical Apple silicon experience—even with heavy use, they only need to be charged once a day.

    Finally, I’d like to add a few more words about the nano-texture display. When using the previous generation of MacBook Pro, I felt that the nano-texture display was not a suitable choice for most users, because it would sacrifice the display quality of the screen to some extent—you spend Pro-level money to buy a Liquid Retina XDR display with excellent color accuracy and brightness, yet you still have to spend extra money to weaken its display quality, which sounds a bit counterproductive.

    Even outdoors, the MacBook with a nano-texture display can show everything clearly.

    But after that, I started paying more attention to my work and living environments and realized that there are actually quite a few strange and bothersome light sources around. Especially in various office settings, little consideration is given to screen glare from electronic devices. Many places rely heavily on high-intensity point light sources rather than uniform planar lighting, leading to severe issues like “a screen full of glare spots as soon as you turn on the computer.” In such environments, the anti-reflective effect of the nano-texture screen becomes particularly practical.

    So, my perspective has changed: if you’re considering buying a new device, I suggest first observing the environment where you frequently use your computer. If lighting conditions are difficult to control and you need to use the laptop’s built-in screen for extended periods, then the nano-texture display should be prioritized whenever possible.

    Performance: A Major Leap in NPU

    To summarize briefly, most current benchmark results indicate that the M5 MacBook Pro shows a modest improvement in CPU performance compared to its predecessor, a 20% to 30% boost in GPU performance, and a significant leap in NPU capabilities. My conclusions are largely consistent with these findings.
    In terms of testing methodology, I deliberately avoided using standard benchmarking tools. Instead, I selected several apps that I frequently use in my daily workflow and that are genuinely representative of real-world performance to compare the differences between the M4 and M5 under actual usage conditions.
    Starting with the podcast editing tool Reaper, I used the renowned long-form podcast How to Get Rich by investor Naval as the audio source. I took the first hour of the podcast, applied the intelligent audio enhancement plugin dxRevive Pro—an extremely resource-intensive plugin—and exported the file in .mp3 format. Audio rendering primarily tests the CPU’s capabilities, and with dxRevive Pro placing heavy demands on performance, the M4 completed the task in 00:03:43, while the M5 finished in 00:03:30, giving the M5 a slight edge.

    Rendering audio using “Reaper”

    The second task involves using the built-in super-resolution feature (Super Upscale) of the well-known image processing tool “Pixelmator” to double the resolution of a 24MP photo taken with an iPhone 16 Pro. This function utilizes a machine learning algorithm, primarily relying on the performance of the NPU. The M4 completed the task in 00:00:14, while the M5 took 00:00:12. Since only one photo was upscaled, the difference between the two is not particularly significant.

    Using “Pixelmator” to super-resolve the image, the final output resolution is 11424×8568.

    As the testing workload increases, the performance advantages of the M5 on both the GPU and NPU become increasingly evident.
    The third test involves using the built-in “Small” model of “Mac Whisper” to transcribe an English YouTube video into text. This task primarily challenges the NPU, a scenario where Apple silicon excels. The original video is approximately eleven minutes long, with a total character count exceeding 9,000. The M4 completed the task in 00:00:42, while the M5 finished in 00:00:31. For a transcription task under one minute, the M5 leads by a noticeable ten-second margin, demonstrating a clear advantage in this test.

    Use “Mac Whisper” to convert audio to text.

    The fourth test involves using Topaz Photo (formerly known as Topaz Photo AI) to automatically optimize photos. This tool primarily tests GPU performance, but since it utilizes local models, it also leverages the NPU’s capabilities. I selected five photos from each of four categories—landscapes, oil paintings, celebrity portraits, and cartoon images—and had the app optimize and export them in batch mode using Auto Pilot. The M4 completed the task in 00:01:25, while the M5 finished in 00:01:17.

    Optimize photos with “Topaz Photo”

    The final task involved using the DaVinci Resolve with the Dehancer film simulation plugin to color-grade a three-minute, 4K 60p video shot on an iPhone 17 Pro in Open Gate mode and ProRes RAW format. The color simulation, grain simulation, and bloom simulation features were enabled, and the video was exported as a high-bitrate 4K 60p H265 file. This was a demanding task, as Dehancer is highly resource-intensive, consuming significant VRAM and GPU power, and ProRes RAW encoding and decoding is also computationally heavy. Both computers took several times longer than the actual video duration to complete the task. Ultimately, the M4 took 00:19:40, while the M5 finished in just 00:14:57. In this comprehensive test of both CPU and GPU performance, the M5 demonstrated a more complete advantage over the M4.

    For non-Pro and non-Max level chips, handling ProRes RAW is still a bit challenging.

    In addition to chip performance, some media reports have indicated that the SSD read and write speeds of the M5 MacBook Pro have seen significant improvements. After testing it myself, I found that these claims are true—the read and write speeds can consistently reach over 6,000 MB/s, which is quite impressive.

    M5 MacBook Pro SSD speed test screenshot

    Overall, while the M5 is a base-level chip, it still demonstrates its “Pro” capabilities. It handles everyday tasks like word processing, video editing, programming, and photo editing with ease—as long as no heavy workloads are involved. More importantly, amid the rapid advancement of AI and large language models, the M5 chip undoubtedly signals Apple’s new ambition—in this field, Apple silicon holds great potential.

    AI performance has become a key selling point for the new MacBook, screenshot taken from Apple.

    Purchase Suggestions

    “Who is the base model MacBook Pro for?” I’ve thought about this question for a long time. Later, I realized that I am the last person who should dwell on this issue, because I was a user of the very first base model MacBook Pro.

    There is a group of users whose performance requirements are not particularly high—a MacBook Air would suffice. However, they also desire a better visual experience with an enhanced display, stereo speakers, and studio-quality microphone arrays. They want dedicated HDMI ports and SD card slots, and occasionally, they even engage in performance-intensive projects. For them, the base model MacBook Pro is the more suitable choice

    Another target audience is users who are still on Intel-based Macs. I once thought that the number of such legacy users was quite small, but it wasn’t until I discovered that some of my friends fall into this category that I realized I had taken things for granted. According to the latest statistics from the Steam platform, over 15% of gamers are using Intel-based Macs. Additionally, reports indicate that more than 25% of audio professionals are still on Intel-based Macs.

    “What do you think of the M5 MacBook Pro?